Why New Graduates Struggle to Trust Recruiters

Every year, thousands of recent graduates enter the job market filled with optimism and anxiety in equal measure. They’ve spent four years in classrooms, completed internships, networked at campus events, and rehearsed elevator pitches. But the moment they start interacting with recruiters, something shifts. That initial excitement often transforms into skepticism, wariness, and a nagging feeling that something doesn’t add up.

The problem isn’t the graduates themselves. It’s the fundamental trust deficit that exists between new candidates and the recruiters pursuing them. And if you’re running staffing teams or executive search firms, understanding this dynamic is critical to your graduation recruitment campaigns.

Because trust isn’t built in a single conversation. It’s built through consistent, transparent interactions that prove you’re different from the dozens of other firms competing for attention.

New graduates are uniquely vulnerable to poor recruitment experiences. They lack the professional experience to benchmark what “normal” looks like in hiring. They don’t have a network of colleagues to validate what a recruiter is telling them.

They’re navigating a power imbalance where the recruiter holds all the cards, and they know it. When that dynamic combines with inconsistent communication, unclear timelines, or promises that don’t materialize, the damage to your recruiter reputation can be substantial and surprisingly long-lasting.

The information asymmetry problem in early-career recruitment

Here’s the reality: new graduates have far less information than the recruiters talking to them. A recruiter knows the market, the role requirements, the compensation bands, the client’s actual needs, and what happened with previous candidates. A graduate knows what was posted on LinkedIn and whatever the recruiter told them in their first call.

This imbalance creates opportunity for miscommunication. When a recruiter says a role is “entry-level friendly,” what does that mean? When they promise “significant growth potential,” are they talking about learning opportunities or actual advancement? When they mention a “competitive salary,” are they being honest about the market rate or inflating expectations?

Graduates fill these information gaps with assumptions. And those assumptions are often shaped by past experiences with other recruiters, stories from friends, or anxiety about making the wrong choice. The recruiter who provides clear, specific details upfront wins credibility immediately. The one who stays vague loses it just as fast.

This is where transparency becomes your competitive advantage. Specific details about role responsibilities, actual onboarding timelines, real compensation ranges, and honest assessments of growth potential separate firms that understand candidate experience from those that don’t. When you’re explicit about what success looks like in the first 90 days, you’re eliminating the guesswork that breeds distrust.

Common red flags graduates encounter during the hiring process

Graduates have become surprisingly attuned to recruiting red flags, even if they can’t always articulate why something feels off. Here are the patterns they consistently flag:

Delayed responses to their questions. A recruiter who takes three days to answer a simple question signals that the candidate isn’t a priority.
Inconsistent information across touchpoints. When the recruiter says one thing and the hiring manager says another, graduates immediately wonder who’s actually trustworthy.
Vague job descriptions paired with aggressive timelines. “We need you to decide this week” without clarity on actual responsibilities screams pressure over partnership.
No clear next steps or timeline communication. Radio silence after an interview is one of the fastest ways to damage recruiter reputation among emerging talent.
Overpromising on benefits, flexibility, or career development. When what they experience on day one doesn’t match what they were told during recruitment, you’ve lost them permanently.

The recruiting industry has trained graduates to expect these problems. Many assume it’s normal. But the firms that recognize this pattern and actively work against it stand out dramatically. When your approach to managing sets clear boundaries and delivers on commitments, you’re not just hiring better candidates. You’re building recruiter reputation capital that compounds over time.

How recruiter reputation directly impacts candidate decision-making

By the time a graduate decides to accept an offer, they’ve already made dozens of micro-judgments about whether they trust you. These judgments accumulate. One missed deadline plus one unclear answer plus one delayed response equals a candidate who takes the offer but tells their friends the experience was mediocre.

And that matters enormously. Recent graduates are still connected to their universities. They attend alumni events. They maintain active networks. When they share a negative recruitment experience, they’re not just impacting your ability to hire their peers. They’re actively damaging your recruiter reputation in the graduate talent pool you depend on most.

Conversely, a transparent, communicative recruitment process becomes word-of-mouth marketing. Graduates talk about good experiences. They recommend firms. They return as repeat candidates for different roles. They become advocates. This is why investing in transparent processes at the graduation season recruitment stage pays dividends across multiple hiring cycles.

Your reputation with new graduates determines your effectiveness in early-career hiring. Build it carefully, and you’ll attract better talent year after year.

Establishing Credibility Through Clear Communication

Setting realistic expectations about roles, compensation, and growth

New graduates are already navigating enough uncertainty without surprises from their recruiter. The moment you start a conversation with a candidate, you’re making a promise. That promise has to be accurate, detailed, and defensible.

When graduates enter the job market, they’re looking for clarity. They want to know exactly what the role entails, what they’ll earn, and where this position could take them in five years.

Here’s what we see damage recruiter reputation fastest: overpromising. A recruiter says the role offers “significant growth potential” without defining what that actually means. Or they mention compensation with a vague range that stretches wider than the Grand Canyon.

Graduates talk to each other. They compare notes. When reality doesn’t match the pitch, they’ll tell five other candidates that your firm cuts corners on honesty.

That feedback spreads fast, especially on campus networks and social media.

Instead, be the recruiter who gets specific. Walk graduates through the actual day-to-day responsibilities. Show them the organizational structure so they understand reporting lines and advancement paths.

If the role has a six-month ramp period before hitting full productivity expectations, say so upfront. Provide compensation figures as precise ranges, and explain what determines whether someone lands at the lower or higher end. Include details about benefits, remote work flexibility, training budgets, and mentorship structures.

This isn’t transparency meant to scare candidates away. It’s transparency that builds credibility, because it shows you respect their intelligence and value their informed decision-making.

Growth conversations deserve special attention with graduates. They’re thinking about their career trajectory differently than mid-career hires. A new graduate isn’t just asking “What’s the job?” They’re asking “What will I be capable of in two years?” Connect the role to specific skill development.

Outline typical promotion timelines based on actual data from your placements. If the position is a stepping stone role, frame it honestly that way. Candidates respect directness.

They don’t respect recruiters who promise corner offices after six months when the data shows it takes eighteen.

Communicating your recruitment methodology and selection criteria upfront

Graduates want to understand how you work. They’re evaluating you as much as you’re evaluating them. When you’re transparent about your recruitment methodology, you eliminate anxiety and build confidence in the process. This is where staffing teams often miss an opportunity. Most recruiters jump straight to selling the role without explaining how candidates will be assessed.

Start by laying out your selection criteria clearly. What skills matter most? What experience do you actually require versus nice-to-have? If you’re using technical assessments, explain what they measure and why. If you weight cultural fit heavily, describe what that means in concrete terms for this specific role and company. Share your screening process: how many interview rounds, who they’ll meet, what each conversation covers, and roughly how long the entire process takes. When using staffing software to track candidate progress, let graduates know they can expect timely feedback at each stage.

The recruitment methodology piece is critical because it demonstrates you have a system. You’re not making decisions on gut feel. You have benchmarks. You have standards. You follow a repeatable process that’s fair to every candidate. This matters especially for graduates who are worried about bias or unclear expectations. Transparency about methodology directly counters those fears.

Document your approach and share it early in the conversation. Provide written descriptions of what each interview stage evaluates. Explain how candidates advance from one round to the next and what decisions get made at each gate. If there’s a waiting period between stages, explain why (background checks, reference calls, stakeholder coordination). This transforms what feels like mysterious silence into expected process. You can further strengthen your employer brand by learning how to create a great through every touchpoint.

Documenting and sharing your track record with previous graduate hires

Nothing builds credibility faster than proof. Show graduates where your previous graduate placements have landed. This is your reputation in action. Pull together data on your success rate with new graduates. Track where they work now, what titles they hold, how long they’ve stayed in placements, and whether they’d recommend your firm to other candidates.

Create case studies or brief success stories that highlight real graduate placements. Don’t use names if confidentiality is a concern, but be specific enough that the story feels authentic. Include details: hired in Q2 of 2024, engineering role at a Detroit-area automotive supplier, promoted within eighteen months to team lead.

These specifics matter. They show you actually track outcomes, not just initial placements.

Beyond individual success stories, quantify your performance. Share metrics like your placement retention rate (percentage of graduate hires still employed after one year), average time-to-promotion, and feedback scores from graduates themselves. If your graduate placements rate your firm highly for transparency or candidate experience, highlight that. Your recruiter reputation is strongest when built on data, not just promises.

Graduates will ask “Where do people like me end up?” Answer that question with evidence. When you can point to five placements from your firm who started in similar roles and grew into leadership positions within five years, that’s proof your process works. That’s what builds lasting trust.

Designing Recruitment Processes That Demonstrate Integrity

Structuring multi-stage interviews that feel fair and purposeful

New graduates enter the recruitment funnel with anxiety. They’re competing for limited slots, navigating unfamiliar processes, and often interviewing with multiple firms simultaneously. When your interview structure feels scattered or unnecessarily long, you signal disrespect for their time (and intelligence). That kills trust before the offer even lands.

The best firms interviewing graduates use clearly communicated, multi-stage interview formats that telegraph exactly what’s coming next. Think: initial phone screen (15 minutes), technical assessment or case study (if applicable, with clear instructions upfront), panel interview with 2-3 stakeholders, and final conversation with hiring authority. Four stages. Done. Graduates appreciate knowing the roadmap.

Here’s what matters: each stage should have a distinct purpose that you explain to the candidate beforehand. The first call isn’t a random screening. It’s “We want to understand your background and confirm cultural fit.” The technical component isn’t a gotcha moment. It’s “This shows us your problem-solving approach for the type of work you’ll be doing.” When candidates understand why each interview exists, they stop feeling like they’re jumping through hoops. They feel like they’re being evaluated fairly against a rubric that actually matters.

Staffing firms and executive search professionals who structure interviews this way consistently report higher graduate satisfaction scores. Why? Because graduates feel like they’re being assessed on merit, not on whether they happened to be in the right mood during an off-the-cuff conversation. Standardization actually builds trust, even though it might feel more formal than casual conversation.

Providing timely feedback at each recruitment milestone

Radio silence is one of the fastest ways to tank your reputation with new graduates. The graduation season recruitment campaigns demand speed. Candidates are making decisions within days, not weeks. When you interview someone on Thursday and don’t get back to them until the following Wednesday, you’ve already lost them to a competitor who moved faster.

Timely feedback doesn’t mean saying yes or no immediately (that comes from hiring authority decisions). It means acknowledging that the interview happened and confirming next steps within 24 hours. “We spoke with you yesterday about the account executive role.

Great conversation. We’re moving forward and you’ll hear from us by end of day Friday with the next stage.” That’s it. Takes two minutes.

Creates enormous credibility.

What separates top-tier recruiters from mediocre ones is that they track feedback across every milestone and actually share it with candidates (within appropriate bounds). If a graduate didn’t advance, explaining why in concrete terms is painful but professional. “Your technical foundation is strong, but this particular client is looking for someone with three years of direct experience in their specific vertical.

That’s a mismatch, not a reflection of your potential.” Graduates remember that honesty. They tell other graduates about it. Your reputation expands.

Using resources designed helps your team deliver consistent messaging across the entire lifecycle, which is especially critical during high-volume graduation recruitment periods.

Creating standardized evaluation criteria that minimize bias

Bias creeps in when evaluation feels subjective. A graduate from State University might get dinged unfairly compared to an Ivy League candidate, even when their actual qualifications are identical. Or a candidate’s personality doesn’t match your recruiter’s personal style, and suddenly they’re marked down for “culture fit” rather than actual job fit.

Standardized evaluation criteria strips out the guesswork. Before interviews begin, define what success looks like across specific dimensions: technical competency, communication clarity, problem-solving approach, alignment with stated values, and relevant experience level. Grade each candidate on the same scale for each dimension. Document it. This isn’t robotic. It’s professional.

Graduates respect this because it levels the playing field. They know their evaluation depends on whether they demonstrated the skills you actually care about, not whether your VP of hiring happens to like their energy. That fairness is earned credibility. And it directly impacts your recruiter reputation and ability to attract top talent from campus partnerships year after year.

When candidates (especially graduates) can see that your firm uses consistent standards, they’re more likely to recommend you to peers. They become advocates. That ripple effect matters enormously for building placement success during graduation season and beyond.

Building Long-Term Reputation With Graduate Talent Pools

Leveraging recruiter ratings platforms to showcase your hiring practices

Here’s the reality: new graduates are researching your firm before they even apply. They’re reading reviews, checking ratings, and asking themselves whether you’re worth their time. That’s where recruiter ratings platforms become your most powerful asset for building long-term reputation with graduate talent pools.

When you actively manage your presence on these platforms, you’re not just collecting stars. You’re demonstrating transparency about how you actually treat candidates. Graduates notice when firms showcase specific feedback about their hiring processes, their communication style, and their commitment to candidate development. They see authenticity, and that builds credibility in ways traditional marketing simply cannot.

The key is consistency across platforms. If your firm is collecting high recruiter ratings on one platform but invisible on others, you’re leaving money on the table (and creating doubt in candidates’ minds). Graduate talent responds to firms that are willing to be evaluated publicly.

It signals confidence in your practices. By contrast, firms that avoid ratings or remain unmarked appear evasive to younger candidates who’ve grown up with transparent review systems.

More importantly, these platforms create a feedback loop that improves your actual hiring practices. When you’re actively reviewing what graduates say about their experience with your firm, you can identify patterns in what resonates and what doesn’t. Then you adjust your process. That continuous improvement directly shapes your reputation with future graduate cohorts. Using recruiter ratings platforms isn’t just about visibility; it’s about creating accountability that graduates trust.

Encouraging referrals from successful graduate placements

Your best marketing tool isn’t an advertising campaign. It’s a recent graduate who had an excellent experience with your firm and genuinely wants to refer their friends.

Think about this: when a new graduate gets placed through your firm and settles into their role successfully, they become your brand ambassador. But only if you actively cultivate that relationship and make referrals easy. Most firms drop off communication after the placement is made. That’s a missed opportunity to leverage one of the strongest forms of trust building available.

Start by creating a structured referral program that rewards graduates for bringing in other candidates. Make it simple to participate. A tiered incentive structure works well: small rewards for referrals, larger rewards if the referred candidate is placed, and ongoing bonuses if they stay in their role past the 90-day satisfaction window.

Graduates talk to their peers constantly. They’re connected through university networks, LinkedIn, and social channels that other demographic groups might not leverage as heavily.

But here’s what matters more than the incentive: making graduates feel like they’re part of your team’s success. When you follow up with placed graduates about their career trajectory, ask for feedback on their experience, and show genuine interest in their development, they’ll naturally recommend your firm to others. That personal connection creates ambassadors who speak credibly to their networks about what it’s like to work with you.

Document these success stories and share them (with permission) across your campus recruitment campaigns. New graduates considering your firm will see real outcomes from peers they trust. That’s infinitely more persuasive than any sales pitch you could deliver.

Maintaining relationships with candidates who don’t receive offers

This is where many staffing teams and executive search firms falter. You invest time in recruiting a graduate, they don’t get the role, and communication stops. That’s a reputation killer that reverberates through campus networks faster than you’d expect.

Graduates talk to each other. If they feel discarded after a rejection, they’ll tell their friends. Word spreads. Suddenly, your firm has a reputation as transactional and dismissive, even if that wasn’t your intent. The opposite approach is far more powerful: treat rejected candidates as future opportunities and build goodwill that lasts.

Here’s what this looks like in practice: after a rejection, schedule a brief call or send a personalized message explaining why they weren’t selected for this particular role. Be honest but encouraging. Offer specific feedback about what they could develop or what skills would strengthen their candidacy for future opportunities.

Most importantly, stay in touch. Add them to relevant updates about new positions, invite them to campus events, or share industry insights that might help their career.

Rejected graduates who receive thoughtful follow-up often become your strongest recruits later in their career. They remember how you treated them during disappointment. They also refer friends because they trust your process. That’s the long-term reputation dividend you’re building.

Beyond personal relationships, consider using staffing software that tracks candidate interactions and automates thoughtful follow-up. Software solutions designed ensure no candidate falls through the cracks, regardless of hiring outcome. This consistency demonstrates that your firm values every interaction, not just successful placements. That’s the kind of integrity new graduates are looking for.

Transparency as a Competitive Advantage in Graduate Recruitment

How transparency differentiates your firm from competing recruiters

In a crowded graduate recruitment market, transparency isn’t just nice to have. It’s your competitive edge. Most staffing firms still operate like black boxes, leaving candidates guessing about what happens after they submit an application or complete an interview. Your firm can stand out by pulling back the curtain completely.

New graduates are comparing you against dozens of other recruiters. They’re checking reviews, asking alumni what their experience was like, and scrutinizing every email for signs of authenticity. When you commit to transparent processes, you’re signaling that you have nothing to hide. You’re confident in your approach because it’s built on integrity, not manipulation.

Think about the specific differentiators transparency creates. Show candidates exactly how long the hiring process takes. Break down each stage.

Explain what you’re evaluating at each touchpoint. Tell them honestly if their background is a fit or if they need to develop certain skills before you can place them. This kind of candor actually builds respect, not resentment.

Graduates appreciate recruiters who are straight with them, even when the news isn’t what they hoped to hear.

Transparency also means being upfront about your firm’s values and placement success rates. If your graduate placement rate is 85%, say so. If you specialize in specific industries or technical skill sets, make that crystal clear.

When candidates understand your actual strengths and limitations, they can self-select intelligently. The ones who move forward are genuinely invested in your process because they know what they’re signing up for.

Your reputation in the marketplace depends on this. Word spreads fast among university networks. One transparent, honest interaction creates alumni advocates who recommend your firm to their peers.

Conversely, one murky, evasive experience damages your recruiter reputation across an entire campus. The math is simple: transparency breeds trust, which breeds word-of-mouth momentum that no advertising budget can buy.

Using case studies and success stories to demonstrate value

Case studies are proof. They’re not just marketing fluff when done right. For graduate recruitment, detailed success stories show what’s actually possible through your firm’s approach. A well-crafted case study demonstrates the journey from confused new graduate to confident professional earning a meaningful salary in a role that fits.

Here’s what makes a case study compelling to new graduates: specificity. Instead of “We placed 100 graduates last year,” tell the story of Sarah, a communications major who didn’t know which industry aligned with her interests. Walk through how your recruiter’s initial conversations helped Sarah identify her strengths.

Show how the firm’s network led to an interview with a specific company. Describe her first 90 days in the role and how she exceeded expectations. That narrative resonates far more than generic statistics.

Success stories also normalize the graduate experience. New talent sees themselves reflected in peers who’ve succeeded through your firm. They understand what to expect, what challenges they might face, and how your team supports them through transitions.

This reduces the 90-day satisfaction window concerns because candidates aren’t walking in blind. They’ve read about similar journeys and know your firm has their back.

Consider featuring diverse success stories across different industries, company sizes, and candidate backgrounds. A computer science graduate’s placement story looks different from a business graduate’s path. A graduate who relocated for opportunity has a different narrative than someone staying in Troy, MI. By showcasing this variety, you demonstrate that your firm’s transparency and support work across countless scenarios, not just the obvious ones.

Beyond case studies, leverage testimonials from recent graduates. Video testimonials especially resonate because they capture authentic emotion. When a graduate talks about what surprised them positively during recruitment, or how your firm handled a challenging moment, that carries weight with prospects who are currently weighing their options.

Making your hiring criteria and decision-making visible to candidates

One of the biggest sources of frustration in candidate experience is the mystery around why they didn’t advance. Recruiters often stay silent, leaving graduates wondering what they did wrong or whether the process was rigged. Transparency here transforms the entire dynamic.

Be explicit about your hiring criteria from day one. What technical skills does the client actually need? What soft skills matter most? How heavily do grades factor in versus relevant internships or projects? Do they value certifications, or are they more interested in demonstrated capability? The more specific you are upfront, the more seriously candidates take your process.

When a graduate doesn’t move forward, explain why. You don’t need to be brutal, but clarity is kind. Say something like, “This role required three years of Java experience, and your background is primarily in Python. Rather than push you toward a misfit placement, we’d like to keep you in our network until a Python-focused position opens.” That transparency respects their time and keeps them as a future opportunity instead of driving them toward a competitor.

Make your decision-making process visible throughout, not just at the end. If you’re using feedback mechanisms, tell candidates about it. If your evaluation includes a skills assessment or behavioral interview component, explain what that measures and why. Candidates who understand your methodology trust it more, even when outcomes disappoint them.

This transparency directly impacts your recruiter reputation. Graduates talk about how they were treated, how information was shared, and whether the process felt fair. By making your hiring criteria and decision-making visible, you’re building credibility that extends far beyond individual placements.

Addressing Common Graduate Concerns Head-On

Being upfront about contract types, benefits, and job security

New graduates are walking into their first real job with plenty of anxiety. They want to know what they’re signing up for, and honestly, they deserve that clarity. When you’re transparent about contract types from the jump, you’re already ahead of 90% of recruiters who gloss over the details.

Start by explaining exactly what type of role you’re placing them into. Is it a direct hire? A contract-to-hire with a specific timeline?

A temporary assignment? Each comes with different implications for benefits, job security, and career trajectory. Graduates need to understand that a three-month contract role isn’t the same as a permanent position, and they’re not getting blindsided when the end date hits.

Benefits packages matter enormously to someone just starting their career. Do they get health insurance immediately, or is there a waiting period? What about retirement contributions, paid time off, or professional development budgets?

Laying this out upfront prevents the awkward conversation two weeks in when they realize they’re paying out of pocket for something they expected to be covered. Be specific. Give them numbers.

Don’t make them chase down HR for information you could have provided during the recruitment process.

Job security is the elephant in the room that many recruiters avoid. If you’re placing a graduate into a role that’s subject to market fluctuations or client budget cuts, tell them that. Explain what happens if the contract ends early.

Do they get severance? Will you help them transition to another role? This kind of transparency builds trust faster than any polished pitch deck ever could.

When candidates feel like you’re giving them the real story rather than a sanitized version, your recruiter reputation improves dramatically.

Explaining mentorship and development opportunities available

Graduates aren’t just looking for a paycheck. They’re hungry for growth, and they want to work somewhere that invests in their development. During recruitment, paint a concrete picture of what mentorship and learning actually look like at the company you’re placing them with.

Don’t just say “we have great mentoring programs.” That’s corporate fluff. Instead, explain who their mentor will be, how often they’ll meet, and what specific skills they’ll develop over their first year. Will they get certifications? Access to training courses? Time for professional conferences? When you create a great during recruitment, part of that is setting realistic expectations about how their employer will support their growth.

Share stories from other graduates who’ve gone through the program. How have they progressed? What opportunities came next? Real examples beat generic promises every single time. If the company has a strong track record of promoting from within or helping graduates transition to more senior roles, highlight that early and often.

Be honest about the learning curve too. If the first 90 days will be intense, say so. If there’s a knowledge gap the graduate will need to bridge, acknowledge it and explain how the company addresses that. This kind of candor makes the experience feel real and builds the kind of trust that carries through to employment and beyond.

Clarifying commission structures, hidden costs, and role expectations

Commission structures confuse graduates. If the role involves commission, bonuses, or variable pay, explain exactly how it’s calculated. What’s the base salary? What percentage or amount is commission? How often do they get paid? What’s realistic to earn in year one versus year three? Vague answers here create resentment fast.

Hidden costs destroy recruiter credibility. Some roles expect employees to cover licensing fees, travel expenses, or equipment costs out of pocket (at least initially). Some positions require certifications that take time and money to obtain.

Lay it all out. If there are legitimate costs the graduate should expect, tell them upfront so they can budget accordingly and feel prepared rather than blindsided.

Role expectations need to be crystal clear. What will they actually do day-to-day? Who will they report to? What’s the team structure? What success looks like in month three and month twelve? When you communicate with authenticity, you’re setting the stage for a successful placement that reflects well on your firm’s reputation for years to come.

The bottom line: graduates remember how you treated them during recruitment. When you address their concerns head-on and provide honest, detailed answers to every question, you’re not just filling positions. You’re building a reputation as a recruiter who values transparency and integrity. That reputation compounds over time, turning satisfied graduate placements into referrals, testimonials, and long-term business growth for your firm.

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Building Trust With New Graduates Through Transparent Recruitment Processes